MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2400 comes out ahead.
I put the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 runs the Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU while the Samsung Exynos 2400 runs the Samsung Xclipse 940. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
1 advantage
-
66 MHz higher RAM speed
4266 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400
6 advantages
-
15% higher AnTuTu score
20.18 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs
-
49% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,785 vs 4,542
-
10% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,067 vs 1,882
-
160 MHz higher CPU clock
3210 MHz vs 3050 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
3407 GFLOPS vs 2762.5 GFLOPS
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | November 2022 | January 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Model Number | MT6985 | S5E9945 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.05 GHz - Cortex X3 3x 2.85 GHz - Cortex A715 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A510 |
1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3050 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | 7 W | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 981 MHz | 1009 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 2762.5 GFLOPS | 3407 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | MediaTek APU 690 | Exynos AI Engine |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4266 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x16-bit channels | 4 × 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K @ 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | - | Exynos 5300 Modem |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.67 Gbps | 12.1 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.25 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 17,54,862 | 20,17,639 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,72,418 | 69,80,818 |
| GPU | 4,51,973 | 6,16,764 |
| Memory | 2,94,681 | 3,05,547 |
| UX | 4,35,790 | 4,04,510 |
| Single-Core | 1,882 | 2,067 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 4,542 | 6,785 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Exynos 2600
- 3 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 4 Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Xring O1
- 6 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G4
- 7 Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 8 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
- 9 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 10 Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Discussion