MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
The Samsung Exynos 2400 leads the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 by 15% on AnTuTu v11 (20.18 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs) and is 10% faster in Geekbench single-core and 49% in multi-core. Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 does better: 2% faster RAM (4266 MHz vs 4200 MHz).
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400: key differences
Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 leads
-
2% faster RAM
4266 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Where the Samsung Exynos 2400 leads
-
5% higher peak CPU clock
3.21 GHz vs 3.05 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
23% more GPU compute power
3407 GFLOPS vs 2762.5 GFLOPS
-
15% higher AnTuTu v11 score
20.18 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs
-
49% faster in Geekbench multi-core
6,785 vs 4,542
-
10% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,067 vs 1,882
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+15% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+10% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+49% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- November 2022
- January 2024
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- MediaTek
- Samsung
- Model Number
- MT6985
- S5E9945
CPU
- Total Cores
- 8
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.05 GHz - Cortex X3
3x 2.85 GHz - Cortex A715
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A510 - 1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 - Max Frequency
- 3050 MHz
- 3210 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9-A
- ARMv9.2-A
- Process Node
- 4 nm
- 4 nm
- Manufacturing
- TSMC
- Samsung Foundry
- L2 Cache
- 1 MB
- -
- L3 Cache
- 8 MB
- 8 MB
- TDP
- 7 W
- 6 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU
- Samsung Xclipse 940
- GPU Frequency
- 981 MHz
- 1009 MHz
- Shading Units
- 1408
- 768
- FLOPS
- 2762.5 GFLOPS
- 3407 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- MediaTek APU 690
- Exynos AI Engine
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4266 MHz
- 4200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x16-bit channels
- 4 × 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 68.3 GB/s
- 67.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.0
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K @ 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
- 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV
- AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- -
- Exynos 5300 Modem
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 7.67 Gbps
- 12.1 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 3.25 Gbps
- 3.67 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- 5.3
- Navigation
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 17,54,862
- 20,17,639
- CPU
- 5,72,418
- 69,80,818
- GPU
- 4,51,973
- 6,16,764
- Memory
- 2,94,681
- 3,05,547
- UX
- 4,35,790
- 4,04,510
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 1,882
- 2,067
- Multi-Core
- 4,542
- 6,785
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+6 pointsCPU Score
+10 pointsGPU Score
+2 pointsMemory Score
+4 pointsMore Dimensity 9200 and Exynos 2400 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.